Gabriel Alvarez Essay Example for Free

Gabriel Alvarez EssayThe Ninth Circuit believed that because respondents donning and doffing is an vital and necessary antecedent activity included by respondents principal work activity, all activities performed afterward such as move accordingly occur during the principal workday and is compensable. The court rejected the petitioners argument that slit 4(a)(1) of the Portal Act makes clear that the walking clipping at issue is not compensable crimson if it follows clothes changing.The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employees of IBP, Inc. because putting on protective tilt and walking to and from changing areas are integral and indispensable to the jobs principal activities. ISSUE(S) The issues presented to the Supreme Court for determination were whether the time spent walking between donning and doffing areas and workstations, and the time spent waiting to put on protective equipment were compensable under the FLSA as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.The Supreme Court held that time spent walking pursuance putting on protective equipment and prior to removing protective equipment was compensable under the FLSA as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act REASON(S) The Court held that any activity that is integral and indispensable to a principal activity is itself a principal activity under section 4(a)(1) of the Portal-to-Portal Act.