Expressing Congratulations and Best Wishes in German

Lord Of The Flies Literary Analysis - 1191 Words

â€Å"Lord of the Flies† written by William Golding and published in 1954 is an allegory and social commentary that takes place on a deserted tropical island. An island that becomes populated when a plane crashes and leaves British schoolboys stranded. The group of boys attempt to recreate the civilization they came from, by choosing a leader: Ralph but, Jack wants to lead also, which causes the boys to little by little leave civility and form into savages. The microcosm Golding creates explores the conflict between civilization and savagery. The two internal and competing impulses that exist in all people: the impulse to live by rules in an ordered civilized society vs the instinct to act in savage ways to obtain power over others and†¦show more content†¦This gave Piggy’s glasses the symbolic significance of rational thought and innovation in society. The beast was introduced in Chapter 2 and at first, it is nothing more than a figment of the boys imagination , the boys call it a giant snake and mistake it for the dead parachuting man, instead of being afraid of the unknown. That’s why the beast symbolizes the internal savagery that comes with fear that not only exist in the boys but all of the mankind. Lastly, The Lord of the Flies. What can a pig’s head symbolize? It symbolizes the evil that exists in everyone. The pig’s head talks to Simon because he is an innocent boy, but it’s not really the pig’s head speaking but Simon’s evil conscience. This tells us that even the purest of the souls can contain evil. Ralph, Piggy, Jack, and Simon. Are probably the characters with the most depth is the story. Ralph is the attractive, charismatic protagonist of the novel. Elected as the leader at the beginning of the story, Ralph represents the properly socialized and civilized young man. Ralph is the one who conceives the meeting place, the fire and the huts. He is a diplomat and a natural leader. Piggy is the most physically vulnerable out of all the boys because although he is intelligent, he has poor eyesight, asthma and a weight problem. Piggy is the representation of maturity of thought and the closest thing to anShow MoreRelatedLord Of The Flies Literary Analysis1534 Words   |  7 Pagesthe most scrutinous detail to his plethoric of symbolism seen throughout the novel, it is clear that he is an experienced writer. From his other books like The Inheritors and The Scorpion God it can still be seen that one of his earlier books, Lord of the Flies, is truly one of his greatest masterpieces. That book would also be the topic of this essay, and from the very beginning was obviously a piece of literature that has aged well despite its year of publish. From the stranding on the island to theRead MoreLord Of The Flies Literary Analysis1546 Words   |  7 Pagesoverruns them and evil starts to lurk over the island.The fictional story of the group of British schoolboys stranded on an island and the decisions they make, relates back to our society and the decisions we might make in a difficult situation. Lord of The Flies is Golding’s attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. The use of symbols in the novel to represent the flaws of human nature, helps create this theme. The conch is one of the main objects the boys use and hasRead MoreLord of the Flies Literary Analysis853 Words   |  4 PagesLord of the Flies, a novel by William Golding, reflects upon the very core of human beings. Golding described human beings as innately evil. He also showed readers that all it takes to bring humans’ true nature out is by being in an unknown environment that is free of laws. Being surrounded by mysterious creatures in an unknown land, the stranded boys are left for dead. In the small world without adults, the boys slowly corrupt in to follow their instinct to satisfy their immediate desires. Read MoreLord Of The Flies L iterary Analysis1406 Words   |  6 PagesGolding’s Lord of the Flies, the book is rich with symbolism and subtext. The story starts with British school boys being stranded on an island after escaping a threat of nuclear war. The boys elect fair-haired Ralph as their leader, but Jack, a fiery choirmaster of some of the boys, is jealous and the story quickly goes downhill from there, leading to aggression, mayhem, and murder. Throughout the novel, there is also a mysterious and imaginary beast that haunts the minds of the younger boys. Lord of theRead MoreLord Of The Flies Literary Analysis1465 Words   |  6 Pagesonce wrote, Every life is a march from innocence, through temptations, to virtue or vice (Abbott 7). This march, as Abbott puts it, is maturation. Inevitably, everyone must experience these phases, ending either in, good or evil. The novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, examines these very steps towards maturity. More specifically, Golding displays through the character Ralph; the phases of psychological maturity. Ralph throughout his experiences on the island will progress and regress inRead MoreLord Of The Flies Literary Analysis1101 Words   |  5 PagesIrony is a literary technique utilized by writers in an attempt to convey a message different than its literal meaning. For this reason, this technique used often in satirical writing, such as Lord of The Flies by William Golding. Irony is an important element in literature as it provides writers with a vehicle to communicate a deeper, more meaningful message. In his literary critique, How To Read Literature Like a Professor, Thomas C. Foster emphasizes the significance of irony in literature, statingRead MoreLord Of The Flies Literary Analysis2085 Words   |  9 Pages The Lord of the Flies demonstrates survival, cooperation, and friendship, and how hard those things are to achieve. It was written in 1954 by William Golding. There are several kids who are involved in a plane crash, and land on an uninhabited island, so they must use their resources to survive as a group. There are many boys, Ralph, Jack, Piggy, Simon, and many others, with no girls. Fights, challenges, and jealousy takes them over and their civilization they created starts to shake. The conflictsRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of Lord Of The Flies2183 Words   |  9 PagesThe title Lord of the flies is noteworthy with respect to the novel. First, the word Devil is a Hebrew translation of the novel’s title Lord of the Flies in which the Devil represents the dark and evil of the underworld. This concept of darkness and evil is perceived throughout the novel as we observe the boys use their survival skills. An example of this is when we first meet the boys they appear to be wel l behaved British boys, but as their need for survival strengths we realize these boys mayRead MoreLord Of The Flies Literary Analysis Essay1657 Words   |  7 Pagesnovel, Lord of the Flies, is a tale like no other. It’s a story of perseverance, determination, survival, and emotion. Golding does a superb job displaying these traits and so many more throughout this story of fighting, not for your life, but to the death. The authors style is one unlike any other I’ve read. I love emotion. I’m not sure if it’s the way it makes me feel or how it can help me relate to the reading, but for some reason I love it. That’s why my favorite style displayed in Lord of theRead MoreLord of the Flies Literary Analysis Essay709 Words   |  3 PagesGreed for Power In the novel Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, a group of English boys in their adolescence are stranded on an island. They crash-land while being evacuated because of an atomic war, so the boys must learn to cooperate with each other in order to survive. The boys are civil at first, but the bonds of civilization unfold as the rapacity for power and immediate desires become more important than civility and rescue. The conflict between Ralph, the protagonist, and Jack, the antagonist

The American Two Party Political System Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper The American two Party Political System Since the disposal of George Washington two political parties have dominated the United States political system, but they have non ever been the same two parties. The first two parties were the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists were those who supported a strong federal authorities and the Anti-Federalists were those who did non. The leaders of the Federalists were Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Both were from the Northeast where the Federalist line of thought was strongest. Thomas Jefferson became the leader of the Anti-Federalists. These two groups truly did non considered themselves parties. The laminitiss feared parties because they thought of them as cabals. They were self centered and driven by aspiration to send on their ain opportunisms. Thomas Jefferson organized his Anti-Federalist followings and they became known as the Jeffersonian Republicans. This organisation of the Federalist resistance in the election of 1800 is what is known as the Revolution of 1800. The Federalists feared the Jeffersonians were out to sabotage the authorities, while Jefferson? s party felt the same about the Federalists. By the clip Jefferson was elected to the presidential term in 1800 his party was called Democratic Republican. The Federalist Party disappeared as a political force by the 1820 election, largely because of its resistance to the War of 1812. The autumn of the Federalist Party left the state with merely one major party, but merely for a short clip. During the 1820? s Democratic Republicans began to divide into two parts. The conservativists of the party favored a strong patriotism, a protective duty, and a national bank. They called themselves National Republicans. The others stood for provinces # 8217 ; rights, duty for gross merely, and an independent exchequer. They took the name Democratic and elected its leader, Andrew Jackson, to the Presidency in 1828 and 1832. The party of Jackson is today # 8217 ; s Democratic Party. By the election of 1836 the National Republicans and other anti-Jacksonians had merged to organize a new party, the Whigs. They lost to the Democrats that twelvemonth, but in 1840 they succeeded in acquiring William Henry Harrison elected President. In 1844 the Whig campaigner, Henry Clay, lost to James Polk, but in the following election Zachary Taylor won for the Whigs. This seemed to be a clip of uncertainness in political way. While this uncertainness was taking topographic point, a societal force greater than party trueness was get downing to reshape American political relations. The slavery issue, with the passions it aroused in the North and the South, bit by bit compelled a realignment of parties. The Whigs party began to divide in 1852. This was a consequence of the deep split in sentiment over bondage. During the following few old ages most Southern Whigs joined the Democrats. Northern Whigs joined northern antislavery Democrats. In 1854 groups of northern work forces against bondage urged the creative activity of a new political party opposed to the continuance of bondage. This party has become today? s Republicans. During 1854 to1860, the slavery issue became such a hot subject that even Democrats were going divided among themselves. In 1860 four campaigners ran for the presidential term. Brekenridge was the Southern Democrats candidate, Douglas was the Northern Democrats candidate, Abraham Lincoln was the Republican campaigner, and Bell was the campaigner for a 3rd party. This was a really important election because the parties were so divided on the individual issue of bondage. Abraham Lincoln won with merely 40 % of the popular ballot. What makes this even more astonishing is that his full part of the popular ballot came entirely from the North. His name was non even on the ballot in the South. It was shortly after this election that the American Civil War between the North and South began. The Republicans emerged from the Civil War with great political strength. The Democrats were seen as the party of bondage and sezession. Republican control of the national authorities lasted for 72 old ages except for the 16 old ages when Grover Cleveland and Woodrow Wilson were in the White House. The Great Depression of the thirtiess had a powerful influence on American political relations. The economic catastrophe helped Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat, get elected as President in 1932. His first disposal developed what has been called the New Deal alliance. Because of the New Deal societal plans, 1000000s of Americans were attracted to the Democratic Party. Blacks, whose trueness had been with the Republicans since the yearss of Lincoln, shifted their support to the Democratic Party. In malice of the turbulences caused by bondage, the Civil War, and the Depression, the Democrats and the Republicans remained the two major parties. This Democratic Party continued to rule the Presidency for seven old ages after Roosevelt # 8217 ; s decease and, except for two Sessionss in 1947-48 and 1953-54 the Democrats controlled Congress through 1980. The New Deal alliance diminished, but did non destruct Republican power. Get downing with the election of Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952, t he Republicans regai ned much of the public trueness that was lost during the New Deal old ages. In 1980, Ronald Reagan, the Republican campaigner was elected President. The American two party system is alone from other two party systems. In Britain, for illustration, elections are held for members of Parliament. After the election, the leader of the winning party is named Prime Minister. This single serves both in Parliament as a legislator and in the Cabinet as an executive and policy shaper. This can non go on in the United States because of the constitutional separation of powers. A President can non function in Congress while in office. It is therefore possible for the Presidency and the Congress to be controlled by different parties, a state of affairs that can non happen in Britain. This control of the Congress by one party and the Presidency by another has by and large been the instance since World War II. The disadvantage of the American system is the dead end that can develop between the President and the Congress over policy when each under the control of a different party. The Democratic and Republican parties in the United States are unlike parties elsewhere in the universe. It is because our party system is really decentralized in construction and does non incorporate stiff subject and hierarchy. It would be merely a little hyperbole to state that the United States does non hold two parties but 100, two in each province. The parties among themselves are really diverse and their dockets vary from province to province. At the base of each party are those loyal to their party, that is those who regularly ballot for their party campaigners. The following degree consists of local party functionaries. These functionaries choose the party # 8217 ; s province officers. Each province organisation so names their provinces party representatives to a national commission. An executive commission is so selected from the members of the national commission. The national commission is headed by the national president, who is chosen by the party # 8217 ; s campaigne r for President, but must be approved by the national commission. Elected functionaries from the local to the national degree exert considerable influence on the operations of local, province, and national party machinery. In malice of the political domination of Democrats and Republicans, there have been several other party motions. Third parties have neer succeeded in winning the Presidency or the control of Congress. There are several grounds why 3rd parties have troubles in constructing a strong followers and acquiring elected. The most obvious is the strong clasp of the other two. As a regulation people resist alteration, and the places the 3rd parties advocate are normally subsequently adopted by one or both of the major parties. The larger two parties have become a runing pot of thoughts and tendencies. They have done this to reenforce their strength, and construct support. The legal obstructions in acquiring a name on the ballot besides adds to troubles. In most provinces it is required to hold a important per centum of the registered elector? s signatures, good in progress of the election, to acquire a campaigner on the ballot. With the victors take all doctrine that most provinces have adopted for the Electoral College, it is virtually impossible to acquire even one of the province? s electoral ballots for a presidential campaigner. Even if a 3rd party campaigner was to acquire the popular ballot in a few territories, all the electoral ballots for that province will travel to the campaigner that won the most precincts or territories. The election procedure and ordinances make it prohibitory for a 3rd party to win. Last, it is really expensive to run a political run. Unless a given 3rd party received five per centum of the ballots in the old election, there is no federal support allocated. This, combined with the run part bounds, restricts the chances for a campaigner to fund a run. That is, unless you are highly affluent. The intent that 3rd parties do function is as a tool for consciousness. They provide information and do the American elector to believe. By beat uping support for their issues they force the other two large parties to acknowledge new thoughts and issues. The American two party system is the consequence of a representative democracy. Unfortunately, today? s elector turnout is typically less than 30 % . I can? t aid but property that to the cynicism and misgiving of our authorities. I believe if the people felt they had a ground to vote and that their ballot truly mattered, they would be more likely to acquire out and ballot. Others are disgusted with the popularity competition that the elections have become as a consequence of mass media and Gallop poles. In recent old ages, I think Ross Perot came closest to doing a difference from a 3rd party point of view. The existent job I believe he had was the deficiency of elaborate planning. With all his graphs and Numberss he could certainly state us the jobs. But he fell abruptly of giving us any existent solutions. I do non see myself a Republican or Democrat and I would welcome an alternate. But looking around the universe, I think the party system we have is the best thing traveling. Oop s, there is that American Exceptionalism once more. 355

On The Human Experience And Tradition Essays - Biblical Poetry

On the Human Experience and Tradition During the Renaissance, a writer named John Milton became the center of much acclaim and much controversy. His writings, though focused on various subjects, always revolved around his thoughts about religion and the human experience. Particularly, Milton wrote from the standpoint of a Christian Humanist. The term Christian, which seems fairly simple to a reader, becomes complex as Milton imposes his ideas on who 'true' Christians are. The term Humanist also leaves some questions in the mind of the reader about how the two terms relate. Another key word that Milton focuses on is Tradition. He uses the term to demonstrate his reasons for arguing that there is only one true way to interpret the Bible. The word Christian means to be a follower of Christ. Milton, in his prose and poetry, argued that Christ is a supreme deity and therefore the ruler over all. However, Milton believed there was only a certain group of people following Christ correctly in the manner the Bible speaks of. This greatly has to do with 'tradition'. Milton contends that most of mankind's traditions are not part of the Scriptures and therefore have no validity. This was especially the case for the Catholic Church, whose tradition conflicted with Scriptures as Milton made sense of them. For one, Milton believed there was a certain order of rulership that the Bible mentions. A woman is the most subordinate then man, Burr 2 man to angels, inferior angels to superior angels, and superior angels to God (Hanford 183). Since the Catholic Church gave supremacy to a woman, the Virgin Mary, over all the nations, men and angels, then the Catholics weren't considered to be followers of the 'true' Christian spirit. Milton "proclaimed the validity of the original tradition and teaching and faith of the universal Church as given by the Lord Jesus, taught by His apostles, and upheld by the Fathers" (Patrides 3). Catholics taught many doctrines other than what Christ taught and therefore their tradition was meaningless. Patrides stated in his novel Milton and the Christian Tradition that Milton did not intend Paradise Lost to be a Christian Poem, encompassing the entire Christian beginning, but it was intended to be a Christian Protestant poem. Another important aspect to Milton's writings is the humanistic factor. Humanism focuses on the entire human experience from inward to outward as a whole. This would include war, love, religion, hell, heaven, and the cosmos (Norton Anthology 1435). Christian Humanism not only refers to the treatment of the Godhead, but also the treatment of other humans. Milton writes that to God we owe "temperance, chastity, frugality, industry, fortitude, and patience," while we owe our neighbor "charity, meekness, veracity, faithfulness, gravity, justice, liberality, and gratitude" (Hanford 3). These characteristics make up a whole range of human emotions and experiences that Milton believed were important to focus on and how they are accomplished with a Christian spirit. For instance, Milton would pay particular attention to how a man dealt with war and with what grace he overcame the obstacle. One instance of Humanism that Burr 3 appears in Milton's work is also in Paradise Lost. "The great epic, which resounds with the grandeur and multiplicity of the world, is also a poem of which the central actions take place inwardly, at the core of the human conscience" (Norton Anthology 1435). John Milton, although focused on a higher power, adjusts his sight to look inwardly also and capture a picture of the human experience. This leads us to see the overall view of man and his God, working and relating to each other in a fashion that was carved out by Christ and became once again prevalent to the Renaissance society.