Northern NGOs

In this look into paper we look at the involvement of Northern NGOs with the developing countries. They argon prime donors of most developing countries programs which are geared towards alleviating the welfare of the tidy sum such as improve health and living condition.Local NGOs pretend been refer as intermediaries amid presidency and the hoi polloi.The northern NGOs serve their specific graze of business and mandate contrary to what the poor country-style urban expect.NORTHERN NGOSNorthern NGOs represented global organizations who are donors to developing countries that are are donors such as field Bank and private agencies. Their relation with the south makes it the subject of this research paper. The human relationship with governments and nongovernmental organization with them gyps a critical role in understanding their mandates and objectives in helping the commonwealth in the rural and urban regions.The urban and rural populace has diverse needs ranging from health, unemployment, education, poverty and access to other gains. In this respect governments have been unable to provide these services to their community in an effective and wider coverage manner. For instance, in South Africa, 30 % of the population are unemployed and for the 20% of the poorest ho enforceholds, 53% ere unemployed (Adato & Haddad 2001, p.1).It is also reported that in that respect is need for job creation in all regions inhabited by the poorest households i.e. urban, metropolitan and rural. Based on these facts the governments of countries in the developing world have focused their programs to alleviate these problems e.g. the welfare of the masses, improve living condition, health and service provision (Li 2005).The programs have extend tod different success margins and limitations. Most of government programs are constrained in reaching the people because of bureaucracy, authoritarian rule and gamey cost of implementation. Since most of the programs are fi nanced by international community (Northern NGOs) and governments.For instance, in Indonesia the World Bank has developed social development programs to help them achieve their mandate and objectives. In order to do these, they have used summary of the needs of the regions to come up with the plan. Due to constraints in working with the government directly they have supported and strengthened the local NGOs and civil auberge organizations (CSOs) to advance their objectives (Li 2005).The rationale use includes improving transparency in closure planning level, conflict resolution and step sponsorship of NGOs. However NGOs have their birth limitations such as the leaders use as a vehicle for repossessation of social and political life. The World Bank has used neo-liberal strategy to construe good governance by instituting a competitive performance based on administrative and decentralized structures (Li 2005).More so in order for the region to be eligible for support from Worl d Bank it had to test copy that it is pro-poor and is monitord by the World Bank team. According to Arya (1999) he explains the role in which NGOs have worked with their government under the funding of donors (government agencies, private agencies and governments). The plebeian objectives for the collaboration include access to technical resources, gain legitimacy or recognition from the people, obtain appropriate solution and developmental problems, enhance peoples employment and provide better accountability, transparency and public reform system (Arya 1999).Donors view NGOs as intermediaries or transitory to government golf links to people and use them to as instruments of improved service delivery and outreach to the government. The donors determine their task as completed when NGOs are involved in the pick up programs with the government. Most private donors do not support or supervise the selection criterion even when there is resistance from the government. However, the y can play a key role in establishing mechanism to bring NGOs so that they have a beneficial effect on service delivery, participation and decentralization (Arya 1999).Northern NGOs for the past tenner have increased funding to southern NGOs with due to limitation effectiveness of delivery, reforms, cost efficiency, sustainability and participation from the government. DeGabriele (2002), when studying more or less improvement of community based management projects. He previewed the World health Organization commitment to provide access to safe and clean water.But from the experiences gathered two challenges emerged water accessibility could not be achieved with the rate of population growth and the intended improvements to health were not realized within 1980 1990 decade. This becomes the redefinition of the plan of community management within water sector. It was realized that water accessibility could only be achieved with participatory role implemented (DeGabriele 2002).AE D (1998) elaborates on the participatory approach used to i.e. the participatory learning and Action approach which involves communities to psychoanalyze their needs, identify possible solutions and develop, implement and evaluate the plan of action. In furrow NGOs can have negative implication to the poor because they can use them to legitimize their existence, solicit funds and raise their profile for the disadvantage of the poor. Changes in their absolute attitude will go way to bring positive results (AED 1998, Kaiser 2000, p. 6).CONCLUSIONNorthern NGOs play critical role in financing development programs to developing countries. They have been involved directly or indirectly with government depending on the nature and intensity of the resources used and the origin of the donor. Most private agencies finance the local NGOs who are viewed as intermediaries or transitory link between the government and people. The donors have used them to enhance their agenda and mandate to ens ure good governance of project- programs they agree with the government. REFERENCEAdato, M. Haddad, L, 2001, Poverty targets, community-based public works programs a cross-disciplinary assessment in South Africa, International Food Policy research Institute (IFPRI). on tap(predicate) from http//www.ifpri.org/divs/fcnd/dp/papers/fcndp121.pdf 8 April 2008AED, 1998, Empowering communities participatory techniques for community-based programme development, academy for Educational Development, Washington DC, AvailableArya, V, 1999, Towards a relationship of significance lessons from a decade ofcollaboration between government and NGOs in Rajasthan, India, Agricultural Research and Extension lucre (AgREN), Available from 8April 2008DeGabriele, J, 2002, Improving community based management of boreholes a casing study from Malawi Land Tenure Centre, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Available from 8April 2008Kaiser, T, 2000, Participatory & beneficiary-based approaches in military ran k ofhumanitarian programmes, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit (EPAU), UNHCR, Available from http//www.unhcr.org/research/ investigate/3c7527f91.pdf 8April 2008Li, T, 2005, The government through community the World Bank in Indonesia, University of Toronto, Available from 8April 2008